Humbling White pride world wide from the moral high ground for the greater good in righteousness and truth.
From: - - - - - - - -@hotmail.co.uk
To: london.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
CC: contactus@communities.gov.uk; enquiries@geo.gsi.gov.uk; info@equalityhumanrights.com; malcolm.watts@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; press.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; enquiries@commissiononabillofrights.gsi.gov.uk; headofoffice@jaco.gsi.gov.uk; info@claimsregulation.gov.uk; inbox@ojc.gsi.gov.uk; public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; nita.gajiparia@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: CPS White Supremacist Racist Procedure?
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:41:31 +0000
Dear Taiwo Adesina Senior Crown Prosecuter,
Thank you for your letter dated 30th December 2012 which I have copied below.
You wrote:
". . . The crown would be asking to court to proceed to trial on these amended charges rather than the section 4A public order Act offences for which you have already pleaded not guilty to."
That statement is not correct.
I have not already pleaded guilty or not guilty to anything because I suspect that the decision making processes of my case have been and still are being impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions or trust, power and authority.
I ask the Court for evidence that the decision making processes of the Court were not being impacted by White Supremacist Racists.
The Court refused/failed to provide any evidence that the decision making processes of the Court were not being impacted by White Supremacist Racists.
I, a Black person, Racial Codes IC3, B9, BEUR informed the Court that I would be happy and confident to plead guilty or not guilty as soon as I had evidence that the decision making processes of my case had not been and are not being impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions or trust, power and authority.
Your letter has given me further reason to believe that the decision making processes of my case have been and still are being impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions or trust, power and authority.
Please would you provide answers to the following three (3) questions:
1. What is the name(s) and Racial Code(s) of the person(s) responsible for the incorrect information?
2. What proven and effective processes are in place to protect Black people from White Supremacist Racist activity in the decision making processes of the Court?
3. What, Taiwo Adesina, are your Racial Codes?
I have copied below the Police and Census Racial Codes for your convenience.
The White Supremacist Racists have the smartest, cleverest, most sophisticated, most deceptive, most ruthless and most powerful members club / network in the known world.
The POWER of White Supremacist Racist people is being neutralised, by the Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) working effectively together with the Black National Party (BNP), in a civilised, orderly, non-violent, dignified and peaceful manner for the greater good.
If you check the facts against the clock you will see that the White Supremacist Racists are losing power and getting weaker every 24 hours as a result of the valuable and magnificent work being done by the members of the impregnable Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) and the invincible Black National Party (BNP) working from the Moral High Ground in righteousness, glory and majesty, humbling White pride world wide.
http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/united-races-race-relations.html
White people of Britain are encouraged to join the "BritDems" (British Racial Democratic Party) and sort themselves out for Racial Equality.
I have copied below the Police and Census Racial Codes for your convenience.
The White Supremacist Racists have the smartest, cleverest, most sophisticated, most deceptive, most ruthless and most powerful members club / network in the known world.
The POWER of White Supremacist Racist people is being neutralised, by the Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) working effectively together with the Black National Party (BNP), in a civilised, orderly, non-violent, dignified and peaceful manner for the greater good.
If you check the facts against the clock you will see that the White Supremacist Racists are losing power and getting weaker every 24 hours as a result of the valuable and magnificent work being done by the members of the impregnable Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) and the invincible Black National Party (BNP) working from the Moral High Ground in righteousness, glory and majesty, humbling White pride world wide.
http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/united-races-race-relations.html
White people of Britain are encouraged to join the "BritDems" (British Racial Democratic Party) and sort themselves out for Racial Equality.
Kind regards
- - - - - - - - -
__________________________________________________________
CPS PRIVATE
- - - - - - - - -
01JP0667312/MH/TA
30th December 2012
Dear Sir Madam
DEFENDANT(S): - - - - - - - -
URN: 01JP0667312
COURT AND HEARING DATE: Stratford Magistrates Court 10th January, 2013
Please find attached amended Section 5 Public Order Act offence charges x 2.
The crown would be asking to court to proceed to trial on these amended charges rather than the section 4A public order Act offences for which you have already pleaded not guilty to.
Yours faithfully
T. ADESINA
Lawyer
Criminal Justice Area: North, East & North East London
The Cooperage
8 Gainsford Street,
Bermondsey,
London
SE1 2NE
DX161230 Bermondsey 4
Tel: 0203 357 7000
Email:
London.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
____________________________________________________________
- - - - - - - - 01JP0667312
AMENDED CHARGES
1) On 04/08/12 at Kings Head Hill, London E4 displayed any writing, sign or other visible representation which was threatening, abusive or insulting within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby
Contrary to section 5(1) and (6) of the Public Order Act 1986
2) On 10/09/12 at station Road London E4 displayed any writing, sign or other visible representation which was threatening, abusive or insulting within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby
Contrary to section 5(1) and (6) of the Public Order Act 1986
Taiwo Adesina
Senior Crown Prosecuter
30/12/12
________________________________________________
Source: http://www.education.gov.uk/escs-isb/standardslibrary/a0077051/ethnicity-data-standard
Dear Miss H. Shaw Senior Crown Prosecutor,
Thank you for your letter dated 4th January 2013 which I have copied below.
You, Miss H. Shaw, have written:
I have copied below the Police and Census Racial Codes for your convenience.
The White Supremacist Racists have the smartest, cleverest, most sophisticated, most deceptive, most ruthless and most powerful members club / network in the known world. God is White but God is not The Almighty.The POWER of White Supremacist Racist people is being neutralised, by the Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) working effectively together with the Black National Party (BNP), in a civilised, orderly, non-violent, dignified and peaceful manner for the greater good.
4th January 2013
01JP0667312/MH/HS
URN: 01JP0667312
Dear Sirs
LETTER TO DEFENCE WHERE THERE IS NO MATERIAL TO DISCLOSE (MAGISTRATES’ COURT)
R v - – - – - – - – - -
COURT AND NEXT HEARING DATE: Stratford Magistrates Court 10th January, 2013
I am required to disclose to you any prosecution material which has not previously been disclosed, and which might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case against the accused or of assisting the case for the accused.
Attached to this letter is a copy of the schedule of non-sensitive unused material. The disclosure officer in this case is DC Marcos.
Where the word ‘evidence’ appears alongside any item, the items listed on the schedule are intended to be used as part of the prosecution case. You will receive a written notice should the position change.
At this stage, there is no prosecution material which requires disclosure to you.
**In magistrates’ court cases, a defence statement is optional. If you supply a written defence statement to me and to the court within 14 days, any undisclosed material will be further reviewed in the light of that statement.
The defence statement must comply with the requirements of section 6A of the CPIA:
(1) For the purposes of this Part a defence statement is a written statement-
(a) setting out the nature of the accused’s defence, including any particular defences on which he intends to rely,
(b) indicating the matters of fact on which he takes issue with the prosecution,
(c) setting out, in the case of each such matter, why he takes issue with the prosecution,
[(ca) setting out particulars of the matters of fact on which he intends to rely for the purposes of his defence, and]
(d) indicating any point of law (including any point as to the admissibility of evidence or an abuse of process) which he wishes to take, and any authority on which he intends to rely for that purpose.
(2) A defence statement that discloses an alibi must give particulars of it, including-
(a) the name, address and date of birth of any witness the accused believes is able to give evidence in support of the alibi, or as many of those details as are known to the accused when the statement is given;
(b) any information in the accused’s possession which might be of material assistance in identifying or finding any such witness in whose case any of the details mentioned in paragraph (a) are not known to the accused when the statement is given.
In accordance with any continuing duty, I will review the information you provide in the statement to identify any remaining material which has not already been disclosed. The statement will also be relied on by the court if you later make an application under section 8 CPIA.
If you do not make a CPIA-compliant defence statement where one is required or provided, or do so late, the court may hear comment and/or draw an adverse inference.
You are also required to give advance details of any witnesses you intend to call at trial within 14 days, which can be extended on application. If you do not give details, or do so late, the court may comment and/or draw an adverse inference.
Yours faithfully
Miss H. Shaw
Senior Crown Prosecutor
CPIA 2 (MC) (03.12)
Criminal Justice Area: North, East & North East London
The Cooperage
8 Gainsford Street,
Bermondsey,
London
SE1 2NE
DX161230 Bermondsey 4
Tel: 0203 357 7000
Email:
London.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
_________________________________________________________________
From: – - – - – - – - – - @hotmail.co.uk
To: london.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
CC: contactus@communities.gov.uk; enquiries@geo.gsi.gov.uk; info@equalityhumanrights.com; malcolm.watts@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; press.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; enquiries@commissiononabillofrights.gsi.gov.uk; headofoffice@jaco.gsi.gov.uk; info@claimsregulation.gov.uk; inbox@ojc.gsi.gov.uk; public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; nita.gajiparia@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: CPS Miss H. Shaw Senior Crown Prosecutor
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:05:26 +0000
To: london.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
CC: contactus@communities.gov.uk; enquiries@geo.gsi.gov.uk; info@equalityhumanrights.com; malcolm.watts@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; press.enquiries@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk; enquiries@commissiononabillofrights.gsi.gov.uk; headofoffice@jaco.gsi.gov.uk; info@claimsregulation.gov.uk; inbox@ojc.gsi.gov.uk; public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; nita.gajiparia@judiciary.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: CPS Miss H. Shaw Senior Crown Prosecutor
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 14:05:26 +0000
Dear Miss H. Shaw Senior Crown Prosecutor,
Thank you for your letter dated 4th January 2013 which I have copied below.
You, Miss H. Shaw, have written:
“I am required to disclose to you . . . “
“. . . If you supply a written defence statement to me . . . “
” . . . I will review the information you provide . . . “
You, Miss H. Shaw, have used the terms “I” and “me”
I am a Black person, Racial Codes IC3, B9, BEUR.
The way I have been treated to date has given me God good reason to believe that the decision making processes of my case have been and still are being impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions or trust, authority and power.
I need to exercise due diligence to find out what or who you are and your state of mind, Miss H. Shaw, to be able to trust anything you write or say.
Please would you provide answers to the following questions:
1. Are you, Miss H. Shaw, a White person?
Please would you provide answers to the following questions:
1. Are you, Miss H. Shaw, a White person?
2. Are you, Miss H. Shaw, a White Supremacist Racist?
3. What are your Racial Codes, Miss H. Shaw?
4. What proven and effective processes are in place to protect Black people from White Supremacist Racist activity in the decision making processes of the Court?
4. What proven and effective processes are in place to protect Black people from White Supremacist Racist activity in the decision making processes of the Court?
I have copied below the Police and Census Racial Codes for your convenience.
The White Supremacist Racists have the smartest, cleverest, most sophisticated, most deceptive, most ruthless and most powerful members club / network in the known world. God is White but God is not The Almighty.The POWER of White Supremacist Racist people is being neutralised, by the Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) working effectively together with the Black National Party (BNP), in a civilised, orderly, non-violent, dignified and peaceful manner for the greater good.
If you check the facts against the clock you will see that the White Supremacist Racists are losing power and getting weaker every 24 hours as a result of the valuable and magnificent work being done by the members of the impregnable Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) and the invincible Black National Party (BNP) working effectively together from the Moral High Ground in righteousness, manifesting the power of The Almighty in glory and majesty, humbling White pride world wide.
http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/united-races-race-relations.html
White people of Britain are encouraged to join the “BritDems” (British Racial Democratic Party) and sort themselves out for Racial Equality.
Kind regards
- – - – - – - – - -
http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/united-races-race-relations.html
White people of Britain are encouraged to join the “BritDems” (British Racial Democratic Party) and sort themselves out for Racial Equality.
Kind regards
- – - – - – - – - -
Enfield
Middlesex
______________________________________________________
CPS
- – - – - – - – -
Enfield
Middlesex
Middlesex
______________________________________________________
CPS
- – - – - – - – -
Enfield
Middlesex
4th January 2013
01JP0667312/MH/HS
URN: 01JP0667312
Dear Sirs
LETTER TO DEFENCE WHERE THERE IS NO MATERIAL TO DISCLOSE (MAGISTRATES’ COURT)
R v - – - – - – - – - -
COURT AND NEXT HEARING DATE: Stratford Magistrates Court 10th January, 2013
I am required to disclose to you any prosecution material which has not previously been disclosed, and which might reasonably be considered capable of undermining the prosecution case against the accused or of assisting the case for the accused.
Attached to this letter is a copy of the schedule of non-sensitive unused material. The disclosure officer in this case is DC Marcos.
Where the word ‘evidence’ appears alongside any item, the items listed on the schedule are intended to be used as part of the prosecution case. You will receive a written notice should the position change.
At this stage, there is no prosecution material which requires disclosure to you.
**In magistrates’ court cases, a defence statement is optional. If you supply a written defence statement to me and to the court within 14 days, any undisclosed material will be further reviewed in the light of that statement.
The defence statement must comply with the requirements of section 6A of the CPIA:
(1) For the purposes of this Part a defence statement is a written statement-
(a) setting out the nature of the accused’s defence, including any particular defences on which he intends to rely,
(b) indicating the matters of fact on which he takes issue with the prosecution,
(c) setting out, in the case of each such matter, why he takes issue with the prosecution,
[(ca) setting out particulars of the matters of fact on which he intends to rely for the purposes of his defence, and]
(d) indicating any point of law (including any point as to the admissibility of evidence or an abuse of process) which he wishes to take, and any authority on which he intends to rely for that purpose.
(2) A defence statement that discloses an alibi must give particulars of it, including-
(a) the name, address and date of birth of any witness the accused believes is able to give evidence in support of the alibi, or as many of those details as are known to the accused when the statement is given;
(b) any information in the accused’s possession which might be of material assistance in identifying or finding any such witness in whose case any of the details mentioned in paragraph (a) are not known to the accused when the statement is given.
In accordance with any continuing duty, I will review the information you provide in the statement to identify any remaining material which has not already been disclosed. The statement will also be relied on by the court if you later make an application under section 8 CPIA.
If you do not make a CPIA-compliant defence statement where one is required or provided, or do so late, the court may hear comment and/or draw an adverse inference.
You are also required to give advance details of any witnesses you intend to call at trial within 14 days, which can be extended on application. If you do not give details, or do so late, the court may comment and/or draw an adverse inference.
Yours faithfully
Miss H. Shaw
Senior Crown Prosecutor
CPIA 2 (MC) (03.12)
Criminal Justice Area: North, East & North East London
The Cooperage
8 Gainsford Street,
Bermondsey,
London
SE1 2NE
DX161230 Bermondsey 4
Tel: 0203 357 7000
Email:
London.magistratesnortheast@cps.gsi.gov.uk
_________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
CPS White Supremacist Racist Procedure?
ReplyDelete"Dear Taiwo Adesina Senior Crown Prosecuter,
Thank you for your letter dated 30th December 2012 which I have copied below.
You wrote:
". . . The crown would be asking to court to proceed to trial on these amended charges rather than the section 4A public order Act offences for which you have already pleaded not guilty to."
That statement is not correct.
I have not already pleaded guilty or not guilty to anything because I suspect that the decision making processes of my case have been and still are being impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions or trust, power and authority...."
In the BLACK POWER EXPO II 20 December 2012 magistrate court proceedings the IC3 (Black) person did not plead guilty or not guilty. The Judge entered a plea of not guilty. This member of the Counter-White Supremacist Racist Networks was witness to the proceedings.
BLACK POWER EXPO II
http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/black-power-expo-ii-2012.html