United Races Racial Democratic Page Views

Friday, 7 September 2012

THE BLACK YACHT and the SECRETARY OF STATE




THE BLACK YACHT
and the
SECRETARY OF STATE




________________________________________________


From: - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To: stratford.appeals@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk; customerservicecshq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; courtofprotectionenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; gl-enfieldmcenq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; info@ismailandco.com; rubini.subramaniam@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; pauline.gray@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; contactus@communities.gov.uk; enquiries@geo.gsi.gov.uk; ministers@dwp.gsi.gov.uk; mcol@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
CC: christiana.during@enfield.gov.uk; cllr.christine.hamilton@enfield.gov.uk; cllr.nneka.keazor@enfield.gov.uk; cllr.ozzie.uzoanya@enfield.gov.uk; info@equalityhumanrights.com; foi@equalityhumanrights.com
Subject: Tribunals Service - The Upper Tribunal Appeals
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:20:44 +0100

To:
Ruhena Begum
The Tribunals Service
Social Security and Child Support Administrative Support Centre.
PO Box 14620
Birmingham B16 6FR

Telephone: 0845 408 3500
Fax:: 0121 450 6392

Ismail & Co. Solicitors
288 Southbury Road
Enfield,
Middlesex, EN1 1TR
Ph - +44 (0) 20 8804 1065
Fax- +44 (0) 20 8804 1199
DX : 133186 Enfield 6
Crime Emergency: 0771 353 21 73
Email: info@ismailandco.com
From:
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -

NO FIXED ABODE
Contact Address
- - - - - - - - - - -
Enfield
Middlesex
- - - - - - -

Copy:
Jobcentre Plus
Stratford BDC
9 Elms Lane
London
SW95 9AB


Appeal Reference Numbers; 
SC921/12/00601
SC921/12/00600
SC921/12/00599
SC921/12/00598
SC921/12/00597
SC921/12/00595
Date: 07 September 2012
 
Dear Ruhena Begum,

Thank you for your letter dated 04/09/2012.

In regard to the Statement of the Reasons for the Decision I would like to appeal to The Upper Tribunal.
 
These are the reasons why I think the Tribunal made a mistake in the way they applied the law.

1. The Tribunal wrote:

". . . Mr - - - - - - does not dispute that the Secretary of State is entitled to make the type of arrangements referred to above to assist people to enhance their jobs skills . . . . ."

That statement is not correct.

I, a Black person (IC3.BEUR), do dispute that the Secretary of State is entitled to make the type of arrangements referred to above to assist people to enhance their job skills until such time that the Secretary of State, states that he/she is not a White Supremacist Racist and until such time that it can be shown that the decision making processes of the Secretary of State are not impacted by White Supremacist Racists.


2. The Tribunal wrote:

". . . Good cause is defined "some fact which having regard to all the claimant's circumstance would probably have caused a reasonable person of his age and experience to act or fail to act as the claimant did. . . ."

My age and experience as a reasonable Black person (IC3.BEUR), a victim of White Supremacy, caused me to act as I did and continue to do.


3. The Tribunal wrote:

". . . Mr - - - - - -  has not provided any evidence to support his contentions about Ingeus or to demonstrate that he would be discriminated against by that organisation. . . ."

That statement is not correct.

I, a Black person (IC3.BEUR), have been discriminated against in that Ingeus has refused to allow me access to information that would help me to decide whether Ingeus is a White Supremacist Racist organisation or not. This fact is evidence which provides "good cause" for me to distrust and avoid the Ingeus organisation.



Please send me:

1. proof / evidence that The Upper Tribunal decision making processes are not impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions of trust, authority and power.

2. proof / evidence that The Upper Tribunal service has a well managed, effective and transparent Racial Equality Strategy.

Because:

1. I suspect that The Upper Tribunal is impacted by Institutional Racism.

2. I suspect that The Upper Tribunal does not have a well managed, effective and transparent Race Equality Strategy.

3. I suspect that The Upper Tribunal  decision making processes are impacted by White Supremacist Racists in positions of trust, authority and power.

4. I suspect that The Upper Tribunal  has a problem with Race Inequality.

5. I suspect that The Upper Tribunal  has White Supremacist Racist staff in positions of power working to confuse, abuse, exploit, cripple and kill Black and non-white staff and service users thereby making The Upper Tribunal  “not fit for purpose” until such time that the problem of Race Inequality is solved.

Race Code (Police and Census) details are available here:

http://united-races.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/europol-racial-examination.htmlThe White Supremacist Racists have the smartest, cleverest, most sophisticated, most deceptive, most ruthless and most powerful members club / network in the known world.

The POWER of White people is being neutralised, by the Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) working together with the Black National Party (BNP), in a civilised, orderly, non-violent, dignified and peaceful manner for the greater good.

If you check the facts against the clock you will see that the White Supremacist Racists are losing power and getting weaker every 24 hours as a result of the valuable and magnificent work being done by the members of the impregnable Race Equality Secret Service (RESS) and the invincible Black National Party (BNP) working from the Moral High Ground in glory and majesty.
 You White people of Britain are encouraged to join the "BritDems" (British Racial Democratic Party) and sort yourselves out for Racial Equality.
Please advise

Kind regards

------- --------- (IC3.BEUR)



________________________________________________








THE
HOLY BOOK OF RACIAL GOVERNMENT









.