http://www.ligali.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=5009
Feel the power, humble yourselves you White Supremacist Racists, and recognise the emissaries of The Almighty.
What say ye? (What say you all?)
THE HOLY BOOK OF RACIAL GOVERNMENT
Nigel Edgington
ReplyDeleteThe representative of White Power must be aware that it is absolutely critical that the IC3 is not given the information they asked for, as this will set a precedent in White and Black Power Relations. This is the reason your request for information has apparently been fraudulently perceived as time wasting.
Stalemate
Stalemate is a situation in the game of chess where the player whose turn it is to move is not in check but has no legal moves. A stalemate ends the game in a draw (i.e. having no winner). Stalemate is covered in the rules of chess.
During the endgame, stalemate is a resource that can enable the player with the inferior position to draw the game. In more complicated positions, stalemate is much rarer, usually taking the form of a swindle that succeeds only if the superior side is inattentive. Stalemate is also a common theme in endgame studies and other chess problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalemate
Swindle (chess)
In chess, a swindle is a ruse by which a player in a losing position tricks his opponent, and thereby achieves a win or draw instead of the expected loss.[1][2][3][4][5] It may also refer more generally to obtaining a win or draw from a clearly losing position.[6] I. A. Horowitz and Fred Reinfeld distinguish among "traps", "pitfalls", and "swindles". In their terminology, a "trap" refers to a situation where a player goes wrong through his own efforts. In a "pitfall", the beneficiary of the pitfall plays an active role, creating a situation where a plausible move by the opponent will turn out badly. A "swindle" is a pitfall adopted by a player who has a clearly lost game.[7] Horowitz and Reinfeld observe that swindles, "though ignored in virtually all chess books", "play an enormously important role in over-the-board chess, and decide the fate of countless games".[8]
Although "swindling" in general usage is synonymous with cheating or fraud, in chess the term does not imply that the swindler has done anything unethical or unsportsmanlike.[9][10] There is nonetheless a faint stigma attached to swindles, since players feel that one who has outplayed one's opponent for almost the entire game "is 'morally' entitled to victory"[11] and a swindle is thus regarded as "rob[bing] the opponent of a well-earned victory".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swindle_(chess)
Precedent
In common law legal systems, a precedent or authority is a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. The general principle in common law legal systems is that similar cases should be decided so as to give similar and predictable outcomes, and the principle of precedent is the mechanism by which that goal is attained. Black's Law Dictionary defines "precedent" as a "rule of law established for the first time by a court for a particular type of case and thereafter referred to in deciding similar cases."[1] common law precedent is a third kind of law, on equal footing with statutory law (statutes and codes enacted by legislative bodies), and regulatory law (regulations promulgated by executive branch agencies).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent
Diversity statistics and general overview
ReplyDeletehttp://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications-and-reports/statistics/diversity-stats-and-gen-overview
The statistics show that there are no Black Judges or Black Deputy Judges for the Magistrates Courts.
The statistics show that there are 5 Black Judges in the Court System.